Last month I posted a page on Mary Stewart’s 1961 novel The Ivy Tree and hosted a guest review of the book by Annabel Frazer. This post shows some art from a magazine and the Reader’s Digest – you might also like to look at this previous post on The Ivy Tree book covers. I began this post as a general ‘more about…’ post but I am splitting it into two so that anyone can read this part without being exposed to the major spoilers that will be a feature of the second part.

The Ivy Tree was serialised in Woman’s Journal, a British magazine published monthly by Fleetway Publications, as ‘The Master of Whitescar’. The story ran for four months from June to September 1961, with this wonderfully moody illustration appearing in the August edition of the magazine. I’m sorry to say I don’t know who the illustrator is but I think we can safely assume that the image refers to the aftermath of Julie’s walk on the night of Matthew Winslow’s birthday. Do the characters look anything like you would expect them to? It seems to me that, very often, illustrators were not given even basic information on characters, such as their hair colour.
The Reader’s Digest Association also featured an abridged version of The Ivy Tree, in 1963. I am no fan of abridged books but they do sometimes include a very informative section on the featured authors. Unfortunately, the author information here does not tell us anything new about Mary Stewart: it seems to cover similar ground as, for example, Roy Newquist’s interview of her for Counterpoint. Mary Stewart seems to have guarded her privacy pretty well and to have disclosed similar, limited information about herself in the interviews that she allowed. Still, we are told that
She is, like her novels, attractive, amusing and forthright in her views. She holds very definite opinions on the great writers of the past and on her own contemporaries, and for many years she lectured undergraduates on “The Novel”. I suspect that her lectures were anything but dryly academic, for the point that she would emphasize was that a novel must tell a story.
The Reader’s Digest edition also contains several evocative illustrations. I have included two of them here: the top one is from the opening scene at Hadrian’s Wall, and the lower one is set on the same fateful evening as the magazine image above. The illustrator is Walter Wyles, and you can read more about him in this interesting blog post, which also links to a flickr gallery showcasing some of his work.


For me, book covers and illustrations are a valuable ‘added extra’ to the enjoyment I gain from Mary Stewart novels. Do you feel the same? Do you have a favourite illustrator? I’d love to hear your views.
I have a copy of The Ivy Tree that I think was published in 1976 – it seems to be the same print run as my copy of Nine Coaches Waiting (with the white cover and drawings of the heroine and part of the background), but I have no idea who the illustrator is. I like these illustrations; I also like the newest illustrations and those of the paperbacks that came out around 2006 (e.g. my copies of the Gabriel Hounds and Stormy Petrel).
I have a very mixed collection, as I was mostly buying them from second-hand bookshops as a teenager – I’ll have to ask you who the illustrators are as I blog them 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Laura, it sounds as though you have a Coronet pb of The Ivy Tree? The Coronets are a lovely set of images but I don’t know who illustrated them I’m afraid. If I find out, I’ll let you know. As ever, I’m looking forward to your posts!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yep, I think it’s a Coronet. I love looking at how the book art has changed over the years – I’m sometimes tempted to buy other editions, but unfortunately I don’t have a huge amount of bookshelf space
LikeLiked by 2 people
The art on the different issues fascinate me, I suppose they reflect back to us our changing society and culture. And it’s a good cultural change that illustrators now get a mention on books! I wonder if any of our MS heroines were drawn by female illustrators – for some of the covers I’m pretty sure I’m seeing a male gaze at work…
I should probably recommend you don’t start buying other editions, it is a slippery path! I’m slightly embarrassed by how many Mary Stewarts I own – but I know it won’t stop me buying more.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’d have to agree about the illustrations and gender, I think I can see the same thing.
I’m trying not to buy more, but it’s tempting as there are some very interesting covers out there. My original copy of The Moonspinners was actually the movie tie-in – sadly, it was well-loved before it was given to me and I read it to death (it’s the only one I’ve replaced… so far…)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reading a book to death has to be the fate any author would want for their novel! And I like/despair that you write ‘… so far…’
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, I have a feeling it won’t be the only one I read to death somehow
LikeLiked by 2 people
the Ivy Tree is my favourite of the books (although vying closely with Wildfire At Midnight) and my own copy of it is a really disappointing cheap hardback with ivy leaves on the dustjacket. I feel ashamed of it and need to replace it with one of the lovely Coronet paperbacks or the newest edition, which also has a beautiful dustjacket. (I am already in the ‘too many copies of each MS book’ zone and have accepted that this is only going to get worse.)
In the pictures above, the serial illustration looks absolutely nothing like I imagine the characters or the tone of the book. Too dark in every respect. It is grim and gloomy and modernistic and the girls also look too dark-haired – surely they are both blonde?
I agree with you about the Reader’s Digest – I’m not a fan but I love this illustration of Con talking to the heroine by the wall. Exactly as I imagine the scene in my head.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for your comments, first I have to say I love your phrase: “‘too many copies of each MS book’ zone”, I am so utterly in the TMC-zone too! I think you have the UK first edition of The Ivy Tree, by your description of the leaves? That cover is a little bit dull, I think many of the firsts were. It sounds as though you will seek out a beautiful copy before too long!(I have the Coronet cover but the man’s clothes put me off – that stripy collar and psychedelic tie…)
You are right, Mary/Annabel and Julie are decribed as being extremely fair, ‘almost as pale as cotton-floss’. And I agree with you about the Reader’s Digest image, the body language and the look of it are very apt. That issue has half a dozen images, and I like them a great deal. Not that I’m trying to entice you further into the TMC-zone!
LikeLiked by 1 person
OK – so they are blonde. Did I really want to know that? Are you sure though? Maybe I need to reread it just in case? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pick up the book – you know you want to!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Get Thee behind me, Satan!” 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you mean something like:
“If one cannot enjoy reading a book over and over again, there is no use in reading it at all.” ☺
LikeLike
Yes, exactly – blonde! I think so too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm…shouldn’t have read this post! You see, I’d swear blind that Annabel & Julie are both blonde haired…except…now I’m being to wonder…to doubt my memory. It is a while since I read this beloved book…and I am long overdue a rereading of it. And I am going to have to be sure…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t doubt yourself, Rosetta, you are quite right – but there is no harm in re-reading The Ivy Tree if it sets your mind at ease… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello. Just stumbled onto this blog while looking for the Counterpoint interview of Mary Stewart, one of my favorite authors. Just read her piece in Burack’s Techniques of Writing, but Stewart doesn’t mention Touch Not the Cat in it, which is unfortunate because it’s one of my favorites. (Who am I kidding… they’re all my favorites! Except for The Wicked Day. Will never read again. YMMV). I’m near Chicago, and wish I had had the courage to write to Ms Stewart back in the day. Re the illustrations: I have now elderly hardcover books, most without their book jackets, but The Ivy tree features some pen and ink drawings inside. I also have what I’ll call compendiums because I can’t think of the proper word at present; 2 books that each contain 3 Stewart novels each. And yes, Annabel and Julia are definitely blonde, slim, with (if memory serves) faded navy/deep blue eyes and fair lashes and brows. I can see them both in my head, vivid as anything, down to Julia’s circle skirt, wide leather belt and tailored blouse, worn with flats, of course…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Eleanor, thanks for getting in touch, I am not blogging currently but I am finally picking up comments here. It is great to encounter another admirer of Mary Stewart’s writing, and I relate so much to ‘they’re all my favourites!’. It sounds like you have a lovely Mary Stewart book collection and I do like how you picture Annabel and Julie in such detail.
LikeLike
Thanks for replying! I’ve often thought that Stewart’s books would make fine films (much like Georgette Heyer’s), but also dread what could happen to them in the “wrong” hands…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, quite, I like The Moon-Spinners on its own mad terms but I was initially rather shocked and horrified by it! I’m sure I read years ago that Mel Ferrer bought the film rights to one of her early books (long lapsed now, I imagine). I assumed he was a director but now know he was an actor married at the time to Audrey Hepburn – I can certainly picture her as one of Mary Stewart’s poised and elegant young heroines. Which character would you have had her play?
LikeLike
Thanks for the reply! I could see Audrey Hepburn playing Vanessa in Airs Above the Ground; she had the right mix of gamine + practicality (being a vet and all). If there was a British version of Doris Day, that would work for Thunder on the Right. Doris Day is all I can come up with offhand, but that books needs a blonde, 2 blondes–a younger one for Julia. Day is probably too wholesome a type, maybe more a Grace Kelly type? I can think of a current star, but do feel that they should be British (although Renee Zellweger did well in Bridget Jones….) I never thought to cast the books with movie stars! Now I have a new “toy” to play with. Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Eleanor, enjoy the game! I can certainly visualise Audrey Hepburn as Vanessa, good choice (although I had a look at my National Library notes and Mel Ferrer is mentioned in connection with My Brother Michael and, by implication, Nine Coaches Waiting). I can also see Emily Blunt as an MS heroine.
LikeLike
I had to look Emily Blunt up, but yes. I am not super familiar with any young movie stars now (especially with Covid not permitting movie-going), but maybe Ana Taylor Joy? Loved her in Queen’s Gambit, and I can see her in Touch Not the Cat or The Gabriel Hounds for sure, and maybe Madam, Will You Talk? I know that Stewart was vague about her heroines’ ages, and that it assumed that they were 18-24 (given the conventions at the time of their writing), but IMO, (fantasy casting) they should be 25-32. So many of the books can’t be updated to contemporary times in all facets due to the plots depending on limited communications and distance etc, but I think slightly older female stars set in the original time frames (think of the fun of the costumes and set designs!) would work fine. We’d need someone similar to a young Christopher Plummer for Richard Byron (I have no clue what young male star these days would have both the visual presence + the wit to play her heroes. Male stars don’t seem to be made of the same stuff as stars from prior eras, but I’m likely biased). Her plots cry out for a Gregory Peck (like in Roman Holiday) or a Cary Grant type.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought the actress in Queen’s Gambit was excellent too. And funnily enough I rewatched Roman Holiday last weekend, enjoyed it very much and thought that it showcased Rome rather like Mary Stewart did Avignon. I agree that the actresses should be a little older (I think Emily Blunt must be in mid to late 30s) and that being set in time in which they were written would be best and most fun. I don’t know many young actors and I tend to picture from the Cary Grant era but to edge towards actors that are still living(!) how about Brad Pitt as Paul Very? 🙂
LikeLike
That might work, although I’m not a big Pitt fan (too pretty for me). We need a younger George Clooney (and British) for Richard Byron. A younger version of Helena Bonham-Carter would do well as Loraine (or someone who can play the gold-digger well, anyway. Helena may be too crafty for Loraine; it needs a 1950s actress to combine the femme fatale + seeking sugar daddy vapidness… and an unspoiled child actor to play David: thin, with dark hair and intelligent eyes, not “cutesy”. I’m so picky!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree with everything you say here. And I’m no Brad Pitt fan which is why I think he’d be a good Paul (vain and not the smartest) Very! I think Rufus Sewell would have been a fab Richard when he was younger, or if Charity was older. For Loraine, beautiful and mercenary, how about Scarlet Johansson? – she is stunning and often has a ’50s vibe.
LikeLike
Ooh, Scarlet Johansson would be good. Or Charlize Theron as Loraine. I can see Leonardo DiCaprio (as he is currently) for Paul… Leo can do menacing. I think Rufus could do Richard now. I think Charity could be played as a 30-something as well. Someone who portrays an inner life and vulnerability, but isn’t a wet blanket/helpless nitwit. Kristin Scott Thomas back in the day… Funny how even doing this is making me realize how difficult actual casting can be!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I like these suggestions! This conversation makes me want to watch contemporary films to ‘discover’ current/up-and-coming actors who would be a good fit for a Mary Stewart film..
LikeLike