I straightened up the car and reversed again, into a donkey. The whole village assured me that the donkey wasn’t hurt and that it would stop in a kilometre or so and come home.
This quote is from the novel My Brother Michael and it caused me to guffaw in the silent Special Collections Reading Room in the National Library of Scotland… Seriously. Reader, I guffawed.
This happened over ten years ago, when I was reading the manuscript of My Brother Michael, having a peek to see whether or where it differed from the published version of the book. The National Library of Scotland is a sanctuary where everybody speaks in reverential whispers, and the Special Collections Reading Room is the most quiet-sshh-whispery space of all. My involuntary laughter had heads whipping round in alarm.
If you have read My Brother Michael, you will know that in its opening chapters Camilla Haven suffers a string of near-disasters attempting to drive a strange car in Greece, and that these scenes are written to comic effect. Some readers are not amused. I am. The cumulative effect of it all – the overturned trestle tables, the cockerel feathers, hitting not one but two donkeys miles apart, the enraged pedestrian (‘I’d hardly touched him’) – it makes me smile. Or at the NLS, guffaw. It is also horrified laughter caused by horrified empathy: driving a familiar car in my local area is enough to make me ‘[hang] on grimly to the wheel… [jerking and nudging] our terrified and apologetic way out through the city suburbs’. I detest driving, I’m unsafe on a bicycle, skis or horseback so I’m not sure why I ever thought driving might be for me – some days I’m a danger on foot, frankly.
Other readers aren’t merely unamused by Camilla’s lack of driving skills, however: they’re annoyed or disapproving. I’ve read before that Mary Stewart undermines women and feminism by making Camilla a bad driver.
Hmm.
Firstly I say: look at Charity in Madam, Will You Talk?. She is an amazing driver who speeds expertly through France while being pursued by a man she fears. Also, she is cool-headed enough to disable his car in some clever way. So I’m all for cutting Mary Stewart some slack, why shouldn’t she portray a heroine as a bad driver this time round?
I’d also argue that being a bad driver doesn’t disqualify anyone from being a feminist. Obviously. And that refusing to allow a character any flaws or weaknesses is – surely? – not doing real women in the real world any favours. Superwoman syndrome is no fun.
I would also suggest studying Camilla’s character and development through the novel. The year is about 1959, she is 25 years old and has broken off a six-year engagement only ten days previously. Since she was a teenage girl she has been in a relationship with Philip. Philip who made things happen, who was always fun. Philip who seems to have been a benign tyrant, with Camilla tucked in his shadow. ‘I had drifted along at Philip’s bidding, in Philip’s wake’ and Philip had been in full control: ‘I suppose I’m a bit of a fool where money is concerned. Philip ran all that, and how right he was’; ‘Philip, understandably, had never let me touch his car’.
This was why Camilla had ended the engagement, to find out whether she had ‘some talent for living’, to establish her independence, to find and mature ‘the identity I had felt it so necessary to assert when I had sent back Phil’s ring’. Camilla is in Greece on a quest for self-worth and to discover just who she is.
By the end of the novel, of course, Camilla ‘the world’s worst coward’ discovers reservoirs of courage and no longer sits back saying that nothing ever happens: she dives into life, refusing to allow fear to stop her, motivated by care for her fellow man (this being Mary Stewart, there is room within the roller-coaster of suspense and horror for a discussion of John Donne and his poem ‘No man is an island’. How I adore Mary Stewart!)
And Simon, unlike Philip, does not try to stultify Camilla as a helpless girl-woman: he divines her quest (‘I had the idea that you were looking rather hard for something on your own account’) and encourages her:
You underrate yourself so shockingly, Camilla… Don’t go on hating yourself because there are some things you can’t do and can’t face on your own. None of us can… it’s time you stopped despising yourself for not being something you were never meant to be. You’ll do as you are, Camilla; believe me, you will.
For me, Camilla’s rotten driving serves to illustrate her initial feelings of inadequacy. The trajectory of the novel shows Camilla’s development from a young woman miserably aware of her flaws and weaknesses and unsure of her own worth or values, into someone more mature and confident who acts in accordance with her values rather than her fears.
You go, grrrl!
These little details are what distinguishes the master storyteller.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I agree, Mary Stewart is an amazing (and effortless-seeming) storyteller
.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m rather late to this conversation, I’m afraid, but I can’t help joining in. I’ve often wondered about the different driving skills of Camilla Haven and Charity Selborne. I’ve always felt that Camilla seemed more a ‘forced’ construct than the other heroines, as though MS had said to herself ‘how can I differentiate her from previous ones’ (like the film producer in Cold Comfort Farm insisting that every new male star needs an ‘angle’) and decided on building in a back-story of lack of confidence like a technician building a machine.
But this theory relies on MBM being one of the later novels. I read them in random order when I was a teenager and never knew which came first – I was amazed to discover recently that MWYT was the first. It’s by no means my favourite but it has all the quintessential ingredients already in place. I don’t know where MBM falls in the sequence – to be fair, it has never been one of my favourites, but one of the things I’ve also realised is that there’s little consensus on the best and worst of the MS novels.
Great blog by the way. I particularly love all the MS dustjacket illustrations – I’ve got some of these copies myself and can never resist a beautiful new one, even if I’ve got the book in another edition.
Annabel (not my real name, my pen name – it seemed a subtle and original choice until I started commenting on Mary Stewart blogs – now it stands out like a sore thumb)
LikeLike
Hi Annabel,
I’m glad you got in touch, it’s never too late to join in here and you make some really good points. I adore Camilla almost as much as I do Charity but I think you are right, Madam, Will You Talk? was an astonishing and unforced debut and thereafter Mary Stewart was keen to try out different techniques and develop characters and probably put more conscious thought and technique into her writing. My Brother Michael was her fifth published novel and I think that she demonstrated that it was not only devastatingly accomplished women who could be heroic and ‘do the right thing’ in dangerous situations. Have you read my post More about My Brother Michael? – there is some background on Camilla there.
You are right too about the lack of consensus on the best and worst of her novels, I can’t even agree ^with myself^ on which is best! Madam is a huge favourite with me but then so is any Mary Stewart novel I happen to be re-reading… Nevertheless, the genre poll in the sidebar of this blog does so far show a very clear preference for her early suspense novels (do please vote if you would like to). Of course, I haven’t written about any of the Merlin novels so far, so perhaps those fans simply haven’t found the blog yet.
It’s good to hear that you own multiple copies of some MS books too, I’m glad not to be alone in my compulsion. I’d be interested to know your favourite book and your favourite cover if you’d like to share that info. Is Annabel a clue that The Ivy Tree is your Number One?
Thanks for dropping in to Mary Queen of Plots, I hope you’ll get in touch again. Also, I love your pen name!
LikeLike
Hi Allison. Thanks, I will definitely check out the More about MBM post. In answer to your question about my favourite novels and covers, yes, my pen name is a clue – Ivy Tree and Wildfire At Midnight are my two favourite books. In practice, I reread Wildfire more often because The Ivy Tree is a darker read whereas I find Wildfire pure comfort reading, despite all the murders!
Covers is a whole different question. I try to have all of them, even the ones I don’t like, in the old Hodder paperbacks with the girl in an unlikely summer dress on a mountaintop, whatever the plot. But your montage has made me realise there are so many more different editions I haven’t yet discovered, plus the recent reissues have really lovely covers so I want to buy all of those too. Time to spend some more time in secondhand bookshops
My favourite at the moment is probably the Hodder paperback cover of Wildfire, which has put Gianetta in a dubious gingham skirt but taken the trouble to get her red hair right, which I like. For Ivy Tree, I have not managed well at all and have somehow got a cheap modern paperback and a different cheap modern hardback, which isn’t good enough for a book I love so much. (Another excuse for a bookshop trip.)
Annabel
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two great choices for favourite book! Wildfire was my first Mary Stewart and it is really special to me. Brat Farrar made a huge impact on me when I read it in English class aged 13, so I was prepared to love The Ivy Tree from the start and it exceeded my hopes for it. Terrific storytelling.
Is the Wildfire cover the one where it almost looks as though she is clutching someone else’s leg because the leg angles are so odd? I love it, also the Coronet cover that is so white that her red hair really stands out. Oddest Wildfire cover I think is the Fawcett (US) one where G is dressed in a green maxi dress and full length billowing red cape, as though she is a diva like Barbara Streisand about to go onstage except she is – of course – up a mountain!
The newest UK covers are I think the best ever, I know I will crumble and buy them all in the end. It sounds as though you might too (nudge: The Ivy Tree is my favourite of the ones I have so far). And it’s always nice to stumble across a different copy in second hand bookshops…
LikeLike
I’m just now reading My Brother Michael for the second time and adoring it. I really disagree with the criticisms some people have made about Camilla being a bit of a wimp for not being a good driver. Her ex-fiancé wouldn’t let her drive his car so she has had no practice. She is driving a powerful, unknown vehicle on unknown roads and in a foreign country where rules and habits are different, such as the bus driver who won’t let her pass. I think she is incredibly brave to undertake this journey.
And there are women like myself (and men) who, through various circumstances, have never actually passed a driving test. Personally, I’m fed up with people who assume that anyone who doesn’t happen to be a skilled driver is some sort of non-entity. We are not the ones who have filled our cities with pollution and added to climate change with our use of fossil fuels.
I also find Camilla’s journey to Delphi a very funny and delightful account. Though I suspect Camilla will become a much better driver in her future life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your comments, Lucina. I passed my driving test when my children were babies but disliked and feared driving so much that I just don’t do it, so I relate to your comments. I like your empathy with Camilla and agree that she is brave to take on driving a strange car in a foreign country; and Mary Stewart is clever I think in how she uses Camilla’s driving difficulties to write a really amusing sequence that culminates in Camilla meeting Simon for the first time in a way that highlights their characters (ie Camilla takes on the drive because she feels she must help in a ‘life or death’ situation despite her lack of experience in driving, plus she is challenging herself as a newly independent young woman. Simon demonstrates a similarly caring attitude in agreeing to help with the car, far beyond the need to reverse for the lorry. His help and Camilla’s acceptance of it speaks of an immediate connection between them).
LikeLiked by 1 person